Irving's concept of "real history" centers on a rigorous methodology focused on primary source documentation and a critical examination of established narratives, often challenging conventional historical accounts. He believes that mainstream history is frequently shaped by political agendas and indoctrination, obscuring the truth. This approach often leads him to question accepted "facts" and explore alternative interpretations of historical events.
Irving's "real history" is characterized by a deep skepticism towards accepted historical narratives, particularly those concerning World War II and its aftermath. He emphasizes the importance of direct engagement with original documents and sources, believing that this is the only way to uncover the truth. This methodology often results in interpretations that diverge significantly from mainstream historical consensus, leading to controversy and accusations of revisionism. He sees himself as an outsider challenging established academic narratives, drawing parallels to historical figures like Cato, Thucydides, Gibbon, and Churchill.
* 2017_oct_nov: Irving expresses admiration for someone whose information gathering and understanding of subjects are "spot on," prompting a questioning of established "facts" due to political agendas. * 2018_nov_dec: A correspondent praises Irving's "dedication to exposing the truth regarding WW2" and notes that school history is "filled with false allegations and not backed by proof." * 2019_jan_may: Irving references Udo Walendy's "Who Started World War II" and Hoggan's "The Forced War," highlighting their use of primary source documentation in diplomatic and political histories. He also notes a feeling of being "indoctrinated" with a "large lie" regarding historical events. * 2019_jan_may: Irving expresses admiration for what Adolf Hitler attempted to do for Germany, acknowledging negative aspects but emphasizing the need for deeper investigation. * 2021: Irving references being ignored in Spain and almost banned in Europe despite his work being referenced by other historians, questioning why he is dismissed as a "racist." * 2021: Irving states he relies on primary sources and seeks to understand the extent of Hitler’s awareness of the extermination camps. * 2021: Irving describes himself as wanting to "know what really happened," echoing Leopold von Ranke's concept of "wie es eigentlich gewesen." * 2017_may_oct: Irving notes Deborah Lipstadt's description of his motivations as "Antisemitism and love of Hitler," and acknowledges that other groups were targeted during the Holocaust beyond just Jews. * denial_screenplay_2015: Irving positions himself and others as "outsiders" in a conflict between "academia versus the rest," aligning himself with historical figures who were not academics.
Irving's concept of "real history" evolved over time, beginning with a general skepticism towards established narratives and progressing to a more focused examination of World War II and its causes. The recurring theme is the importance of primary sources and the rejection of what he perceives as politically motivated distortions of history. His views have solidified over the years, leading to a consistent critique of mainstream historical interpretations and a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, even at significant personal cost.
Methodology World War II Revisionism Primary Sources Adolf Hitler
* diary_2017_oct_nov * diary_2018_nov_dec * diary_2019_jan_may * diary_2021 * denial_screenplay_2015 * emails_2023_2024 * diary_2017_may_oct * diary_2021