David Irving has been involved in numerous legal cases and lawsuits throughout his career, often concerning his historical writings and public statements, particularly regarding the Holocaust. These legal battles have significantly impacted his personal and professional life, resulting in substantial financial and reputational consequences. This page details some key instances and related correspondence.
Irving's legal troubles primarily stemmed from libel suits and accusations of historical distortion. The most significant case was Lipstadt v. Irving, which dramatically shaped his public image and financial standing. The excerpts reveal a pattern of concern about potential legal repercussions, attempts to manage public perception, and reliance on legal counsel.
* 2015: Deborah and Julius discuss the prospect of legal action and Irving's representation. Deborah asks, "You’re not frightened of the big boys, are you?" and Julius explains his role as a "junkyard dog" – preparing the case rather than appearing in court. Denial Screenplay 2015 2015: The Lipstadt v. Irving* trial concludes with a verdict against Irving. The Network Reporters declared, "One of the most crushing libel judgements in history." Irving claims the judge called him an "anti-Semite, a racist and a distorter of history." Denial Screenplay 2015 2015: Irving expresses frustration with the legal process and perceived bias in the Lipstadt* case, claiming judges disregarded contract law and resorted to "legal acrobatics." He believes the judges allowed him to "behave badly and destroy my property." Diary 2019_jan_may * 2019: Irving claims to have spent approximately $800,000 on legal fees, believing the outcome was predetermined due to opposition from judges and lawyers, including one who allegedly boasted of being Jewish. Diary 2019_jan_may * 2021: Irving references a "Trump trial" and criticizes American lawyers and BBC coverage, contrasting them with what he believes would be acceptable in England. He mentions an "IHR order at special rate." Diary 2021 * 2021: Kathy manages book orders, including one to Japan, and notes Mark Weber sending cash. Diary 2021 * 2022: Irving mentions "Corporate Debt Recovery & Investigation" and First Legal Services (UK) Limited, suggesting ongoing financial difficulties and debt collection efforts. Diary 2022_jan_jun * 2023: Irving expresses concern about PDFs of his books being distributed, fearing damage to his reputation despite acknowledging they might not significantly hurt sales. He instructs someone to "keep Google out of it at present." Diary 2023 * 2023-2024: A case involving Gil Ofarim, a pop singer accused of making a false accusation, is mentioned, potentially drawing parallels to Irving’s own experiences with false accusations and legal scrutiny. Emails 2023_2024
Initially, the excerpts (2015) focus on preparing for potential legal battles. By 2019, the tone shifts to expressing frustration and bitterness regarding past legal defeats. The later entries (2021-2023) indicate ongoing financial struggles and a continued awareness of legal risks.
David Irving Lipstadt v. Irving Holocaust denial Thistlexpress Inc