David Irving’s diaries and emails offer a unique, albeit biased, window into his thoughts, activities, and interactions with associates. These writings reveal his daily routines, financial concerns, and ongoing engagement with historical revisionism, often intertwined with personal reflections and commentary on contemporary events. They also provide insight into his relationships with individuals involved in Holocaust denial and related controversies.
Irving’s diaries serve as a record of his daily life, documenting his work schedule, financial transactions, and correspondence. They also reveal his ongoing efforts to promote his historical revisionist views and his interactions with individuals who share his perspectives. The diaries reflect Irving's preoccupation with his public image, legal battles, and financial stability, alongside his continued engagement with historical debates and his network of supporters.
* 2015: A screenplay excerpt depicts a scene where Deborah Lipstadt is humiliated and portrayed negatively, suggesting Irving's ongoing antagonism towards her and her work. [denial_screenplay_2015] * 2017: Correspondence with Deborah Lipstadt reveals her concerns about American democracy and the spread of misinformation, particularly regarding voting systems and the media. [diary_2017_may_aug] * 2017: A diary entry reveals an individual identifying as "Dinah" expressing agreement with Irving’s views on World War II and the control of historical narratives by Jewish people. [diary_2017_oct_nov] * 2021: An email exchange with Gerald Posner discusses a contract between Genoud and Paula Hitler, highlighting Irving's continued interest in Hitler's family and related historical documents. [diary_2021] * 2021: A diary entry references a Bitchute video featuring Irving, suggesting his continued presence and activity on alternative online platforms. [diary_2021] * 2023: Diary entries detail daily routines, including wake-up times, work schedules, and financial transactions (e.g., debit card transactions, net income). [diary_2023] * 2023: Mentions of "H." and the IfZ in Munich suggest ongoing engagement with individuals and institutions related to Irving’s historical research. [diary_2023] * 2023: A diary entry references a reprimand from the CII for a joke posted on Twitter, indicating scrutiny of his online activity. [diary_2023]
The diaries demonstrate a consistent focus on Irving's historical revisionism and his efforts to disseminate his views. Over time, the entries reveal a growing reliance on online platforms and alternative media to reach audiences, as well as a continued preoccupation with legal and financial challenges. The tone and content of the diaries reflect Irving’s evolving strategies for maintaining his public profile and defending his historical interpretations.
* Deborah Lipstadt * Holocaust denial * Revisionism * David Irving